Divans would not be allowed to exist general.
The question of policy after the report after March 1910 to be considered after Shanghai Commission.
The Commission has it is clear will Na has reported that, but I March, that it's resolutions not give much practical and.
Therefore, though the {ou? is going separately (see Arter fabrication & the Demanden.
You wenty stated it seems to have ben Jaklished. Dat bo brave & sof 325 (a). Tha communicatin 76 The F.O Sin F. Lugard's б Na Vieir proper policy for China to adopt.
to ad dzers The Secretary of Stata об ad which The next opcion farm respatch of 187. (12887) well to March : para 4.) it would be telegraph hom at nie.
End to them if H.M.G. have it in mind to adopt the folicy of not allowing any in Hong Kong.
On the other further opin farms hand, if it is intended to follow the suggestion (outlined in Z 43606/08 and refered to That the for para 20 in para 2 (as fondest of Jan 8+ 1909 should cation be quite sufferent (43471))! Then it will Eos is detailed proposals, to wait for the cou.
Apart from Course tance A Приё matter 8 do Hong Kong qastiois · Subsidiary trans despatch. which is of foo but be lim * a progre I don't think there calculated to But (1) it is, of course, suggest comm recommendation it recommends Hang trong 1 and 1 محرم anything in it give Spence.
useless to Chann This 8 The system which is to be abolished in (2) The creation of monopolist for the whole hardly practicable suggested but this is mainly The reputation 1 administrata. heeised China the bebola (witness £55,000,000) matter affecting a4 revenue 8 a Si F. Lugard is reference to The idea (b). Six F Lugard he "pposed" the policy of H.M.G.
Rat It is sifficult to much say in reply his - because, The frist mifer- a out 9 Detra as my amant Jium to this point Па puvate telegram of Dec 12 =, tha Secretary of State said suggestion of hat the Sin F. Lagend one arise
Divans
would
not
be allowed to exist
general
The question of policy after the report 8
after March 1910 to be considered after
Shanghai Commission.
The Commission has
it is clear
will
•
Na
has reported that, but
I March, that it's resolutions
not give much practical and.
Therefore, though the {ou? is going
separately (see
Arter fabrication & the Demanden.
You wenty stated it seems to have ben
Jaklished. Dat bo brave & sof
325
(a). Tha
communicatin
76
The
F.O
Sin F. Lugard's
б
Na
Vieir
proper policy for China to adopt.
to
ad dzers
The Secretary of Stata
об
ad
which
The
next opcion farm
respatch of
187. (12887)
well
to
March
:
para 4.) it would be telegraph
hom
at nie.
End
to them if H.M.G. have
it in mind to
adopt the folicy of
not allowing any
in Hong Kong.
On the other
further opin
farms
hand, if it is intended
to follow the suggestion (outlined in
Z
43606/08
and refered
to
That the for para 20 in para 2 (as fondest of Jan 8+ 1909 should cation
be quite sufferent (43471)! Then it
will
Eos is detailed proposals,
to wait for the cou
Apart from
Course
tance
A
Приё
matter
8
do Hong Kong
qastiois
· Subsidiary
trans
despatch.
which
is of
foo
but be lim
*
a
progre
I don't think there
calculated to
But (1) it is, of course, suggest comm
recommendation
it recommends
Hang trong
1
and
1
محرم
anything
in it
give
Spence.
useless to
Chann
This
8
The system
which
is to be abolished in
(2) The creation of
monopolist for the whole hardly practicable
suggested
but this
is mainly
The reputation 1
administrata.
heeised
China
the
bebola (witness
£55,000,000) matter affecting
a4
revenue
8
a
Si
F. Lugard
is reference
to
The
idea
(b). Six FLugard
he "pposed" the policy of H.M.G.
Rat
It is
sifficult to
much
say
in reply
his
- because,
The frist mifer-
a
out 9
Detra as my
amant
Jium
to this point
Па
puvate telegram of Dec 12 =, tha
Secretary of
State
said
suggestion of
hat the
Sin F. Lagend
one
arise
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.